![]()
After a couple majorly successful shorts and making a splash with the fan-favorite “Hail Raatma” segment from last year’s anthology horror film, V/H/S/94, director Chloe Okuno arrives with her feature directorial debut. The young filmmaker trades in the gore and elaborate creature design for a stripped down, psychological thriller in the vein of Hitchcock, Polanski and De Palma. The narrative of Okuno’s film may not be anything too revealing or terribly original, but it’s the tense grip of the filmmaker’s craft, and the modern viewpoint, that makes it a worthwhile endeavor.

Watcher — not to be confused with The Watcher, the Keanu Reeves thriller from the year 2000 — follows Julia (Maika Monroe) and her husband, Francis (Karl Glusman), a young couple who have just moved to Bucharest. Francis has a splashy new job at a marketing firm that leaves Julia home alone in their apartment for most of the day. Julia, a former actress, spends much of the day alone, not understanding the Romanian language or the geography of her new home, which makes her feel more isolated than she already is. One night, Julia looks out her apartment’s gargantuan open widow to the adjacent building across the street to find a man in one of the rooms staring directly back at her. Shortly after, she goes to the movies, showing the classic film Charade, cheekily enough, and a man sits directly behind her. She then goes to the grocery store, and finds a man following her there, as well. Julia’s paranoia only grows as news breaks of a serial killer called The Spider stalking the streets. Is the serial killer the same man who has been stalking her? Is Julia simply being paranoid?
Much of Watcher rests of the shoulders of star Maika Monroe, and partly serves as a vehicle for her strengths as a performer. This is Monroe’s juiciest role since her breakthrough performance in It Follows. Maika Monroe carries that classic starlet aura not dissimilar to Mia Farrow or Tippi Hendren. Okuno’s camera, shot by DP Benjamin Kirk Nielsen, frames the film with a Hitchcockian voyeurism, making the environments seen very wide and tall, creating a lot of open space within the frame, often making Monroe seem small. Monroe is by herself for many sequences, relying on her body language to convey fear, sadness, anger and paranoia with just the slightest posture change or fleeting glance. It’s a riveting, but very restraint performance, opting for realism opposed to hysterics. It’s a mighty feat Monroe pulls off, grounding the film with authenticity, while keeping you on edge as her steady-mounting fear begins to build and build.

Director Chloe Okuno crafts a steady slow-burn that methodically mounts the sense of unease. The early scenes of Julia wandering among the city of Bucharest, attempting to grasp the new landscape, echoes many of the same visual and thematic traits as Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation. Whereas that film takes a more humorous, melancholic tone, Okuno takes those similar traits and infuses it with a Polanski/Eurohorror sensibility. Okuno evokes a chilly stillness in the atmosphere that feels like a specter lingering in the open spaces of the frame. The filmmaker creates a concise spatial awareness that helps built a great deal of tension. The production design features many expressionist architectures that give off a lived-in, tactile personality of its own.
Like the character of Julia, Okuno never allows the viewer to feel safe. You always get the sense there is someone watching the lead character. Even in small, personal exchanges between Monroe and Glusman, there’s the sense that anything you go awry. Imagine the opening sequence of Wes Craven’s Scream but in feature length. The suspense ratchets up to near-unbearable levels in some instances, with occasionally spine-chilling payoffs. Many scenes of Watcher are free of dialogue, relying on Okuno’s sophisticated visual storytelling and Monroe’s strong presence. If Watcher drops the ball, it’s in the underwhelming climax. While retaining the gripping suspense, the film takes a generic and unimaginative turn in its final minutes. For all its stellar build up, Watcher leaves you with a shrug, where it should leave you with a shiver.

Watcher is a chilly, tense thriller that works as a showcase for both director Chloe Okuno and star Maika Monroe. It’s a steady slow-burn whose bold visual style slowly sinks its teeth into you, even if the narrative drive doesn’t.
Woah, is that girl from It Follows?
Well done – argumentative, informative, acute. I’ll probably add this website to my list of trustworthy websites with compacom.com on top. It’s always good to have a chance to compare some sources of information to get a complete analysis.
I like it! It has a combination of several prominent directors. This is not easy plot to find the right role for the right character. I believe the director did some script analysis before production, and that’s where directors shine. The right casting for the right story. Love the chemistry between characters, from the narration part they work very well together. Looking forward to see this film. My kind of films.
Saw it last night. It was great!
Plan on seeing it Saturday after work! Glad to see an endorsement of this film..
yes, Crimes of the Future was all good and dandy. solid 3.5/5 film.
just got out a screening for Watcher and wow, it really took me by surprise. went in blind and I’m glad I did. not only is it a captivating and a well developed story, it’s production design is great, Maika Monroe fuckin crushes it; honestly I haven’t felt anxious or tension from a movie in a while and this one delivers on that so well. just wanna make sure y’all
DON’T SLEEP ON THIS!!!
4.5/5
I saw crimes of the future earlier, i enjoyed it but didn’t care for the ending, anyone else??
I thought I would like crimes of the future more than Watcher but Watcher was more entertaining to me, even though it was pretty easy to predict imo but I still really liked it! Loving that there’s some great thrillers out recently
I look forward to seeing this as I love a good suspense after growing up watching Hitchcock films. You mention camera shots, more specifically the framing and making her feel small. Maybe I’m too blinded by the flash of modern films but I just don’t see this technique used as often in modern cinema as it was used in the 50s and 60s. Using the camera frame to show the character(s) or scenic fobject of focus and its ratio of size as a representation of importance or prominence, let alone emotional state. It’s a subtle act of cinematography but it carries so much information with it. Reading your description of the scene frame making her seem small while she’s feeling isolated let me see it and invoked faint memories of similar scenes from other films.
As for suspense, I think it’s hard to do it justice in this modern climate because often too much is given away in trailers, reviews, or press clippings as audiences gobble up every bit of information before a films release. Also, that length of time illicit too much idle speculation that gives over to audiences developing their own stories based off of what bits they’ve gathered ahead of release. Our current movie going climate is a detriment to suspense and the sense of discovery in our stories. The last film I remember that feeling of true suspense was the first Paranormal Activity. It was a great concept. “We caught paranormal Activity on camera. We have evidence. So a curious audience sits down to watch this “evidece” and for a long time the audience sits there waiting to see something, anything, only to see nothing. Just when they’re about to move on, wait a minute? Did something just happen? What was that?!” Now they’re hooked back in and the cycle begins again. The whole time though they’re sitting on the edge of their seats trying to analyze every aspect of the frame, afraid they might miss it, whatever it is, waiting for it to show itself. The first one e ecuted this beautifully. I grew up watching horror and suspense, so I don’t easily react to those types of films. It was the first and last movie in a long tie that got me to physically react to being “frieghtened”. And I appreciated it.
I can’t wait to see this film as it sounds like it might be a great view, especially through the window of cinematography and scenic framing
Saw this in January at Sundance…one of my favs from the festival
I am sorting out relevant information about gate io recently, and I saw your article, and your creative ideas are of great help to me. However, I have doubts about some creative issues, can you answer them for me? I will continue to pay attention to your reply. Thanks.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.